Every number on this page traces to a reproducible, third-party or independently-run evaluation — not an internal claim. Built for engineers deciding what to integrate, and for investors evaluating the moat.
90%vs. 69% for the best LLM tested
85.1%vs. 63.6% for the best open-source model
Facial emotion recognition
AIHumanity vs. Frontier LLMs
AIHumanity
AIHumanity Exp15 ONNX
90.0%
AIHumanity Exp15 CoreML
90.0%
Frontier LLMs
GPT o4 Mini High
69.0%
GPT 5.2
67.0%
GPT 5 Mini
66.0%
GPT o4 Mini
66.0%
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
63.0%
GPT 5 Nano
61.0%
Claude Opus 4.5
60.0%
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
59.0%
Grok 4
54.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
50.0%
Grok 4.1 Fast
50.0%
Claude Haiku 4.5
49.0%
Open-source / third-party tools
Imentiv AI
40.0%
Hume
36.0%
Exact dominant-emotion match accuracy on AIMultiple's public 70-image facial-emotion benchmark (manojdilz/facial_emotion_detection_dataset, 10 images per class across 7 emotions).
AIHumanity's Exp15 ONNX/CoreML scores were run locally on the identical 70-image manifest, full-image RGB 224, half-normalized preprocessing — not self-reported. Source: AIMultiple emotion AI benchmark, updated May 15, 2026.
Pooled detected accuracy across FER2013, CK+48, JAFFE, and AffectNetShort:val (13,553 overlapping prediction rows); no-face rows excluded from detected accuracy.
Accuracy is pooled over prediction rows, not a simple average across datasets. AIHumanity Exp15 CoreML uses direct full-image RGB 224, half-normalized preprocessing.